Friday 28 April 2017

Finding the best patent law firm in Brooklyn for your creation

You have found a new product, which you want to market. But, you need to get a patent on it. There are many things that you need to know and do, in order to place a patent on a product. And therefore you will need to have an attorney to assist you with this.

The problem is that you need to make sure that you hire the right type of lawyer for getting a patent on your product. This is where the patent law firm in Brooklyn comes in. With this law firm, you will be able to get all the assistance needed to get the patent on your product. Here are some other things that you should consider, when you are looking for a legal advisor for getting a patent on your product:

Doing some research to find the best legal advisor near you

The first thing that you should do, is to do some research. This is so that you can find many different patent attorneys that you can use in your area.

It is important to make sure that you are hiring the right type of legal advisor. You don’t want to hire someone that doesn’t have any experience in getting a patent on a product. This is because if you are going to use the wrong lawyer and you don’t do the patent correctly, you might lose the patent and someone else can steal your idea. This is why research is so important when you are searching for a patent law advisor.

Making an appointment with more than one lawyer

When you have done your research and you have the numbers of a couple of patent lawyers in your area, then you should start phoning them and making appointments with them.

You don’t just hire the first one that you find. The more appointments you are going to make, the easier it will be to find the right legal advisor for you. There are many patent law advisors, but only a few that are known as the best on the market.

Ask as many questions as possible to know you are using the best

It is important to make sure that you are asking as many questions as possible.  This is to make sure that you know exactly what you need to do to get the patent, and to see if the patent law firm in Brooklyn is the right law advisor for you to use.

You need to make a list of questions that you want to ask them. Don’t think that you are going to remember all the questions. You are going to forget some questions, and then it is going to be hard to decide which law advisor is going to be best for you. You want to ask the same questions to all the advisors, so that you can know with which one you are most comfortable with.

Decide which lawyer is best for you

With all the questions asked and the different interviews done, you can decide which patent attorney you are going to use. You should make sure that you are considering everything before you make your final decision.

You should look at things like the fee that they are asking, the experience they have and the amount of clients they have. You don’t want to use a law advisor that has too many clients. They will not be able to give your product the priority it needs to get an approved patent.

When you have decided on a person that is going to assist you with getting the patent, you need to get a written contract. Don’t even think that a mouth agreement is going to be enough. Always make sure that you are getting a contract on paper. Then, you will know that you are protected at all costs.

It isn’t as hard as what you might think to get a patent on a product you created. The only thing that you really need to make sure about, is the patent lawyer that you are going to use. You want to make sure that you are using one that you can afford, but that is also having the right amount of experience in getting a patent. Then, you will know that you are on your way to get a patent on your creation.

Resource By : https://www.prlog.org/12636179-finding-the-best-patent-law-firm-in-brooklyn-for-your-creation.html

Tuesday 25 April 2017

Corporate lawyer specialist: everything you need to know

It doesn’t matter if you are looking to become a law advisor or if you are looking for one. What really do matter is the fact that you need to know as much about it as possible.

There are too many businesses that don’t have a lawyer or that doesn’t have a corporate lawyer specialist that will assist them in anything that needs legal advice. It is essential that you make sure that you are going to hire the right type of law advisor, if you have a business. And, that you are selecting the right course, when you are going to study to become an attorney. This is why these information about this type of legal advisor is so important:

What is a corporate lawyer?

The first thing that you might be wondering about, is what exactly is a corporate lawyer specialist. And, what it really is doing.

This legal advisor is normally assisting you and other businesses in business law problems that you might be facing. These legal advisors are also making sure that all the contracts that you have with other companies are legit and they are making sure that your business won’t make any mistakes when it comes to the law. Any lawyer can become a corporate lawyer, if they want to specify the field that they are going to work in.

Why does a company or business needs this type of legal advisor?

The one thing that many businesses are doing wrong, especially the small and new businesses, is that they don’t hire a corporate lawyer specialist for the business. And, because of this, they don’t have any legal assistance when there is a contract that needs to be signed.

It is essential for every business to have a corporate attorney, and that you get one as soon as possible after you have started your business. With an attorney looking after your business, you will not have to worry about any lawsuits that might be made to your business. And, you will know for sure that with every signed contract, you will have a contract that is legit without any small prints. Those companies who don’t have this legal advisors behind the business, it is easier to fall into a contract trap and to struggle with legal actions against the company.

The amount of this type of legal advisors needed

If you are considering to become a corporate lawyer specialist, then you might want to know if there is really a need for this type of attorney.

Because there are so many different businesses and companies out there that are in need of lawyers and attorneys, there is always a need for this type of attorney. And, if you are going to consider becoming this type of attorney, then you will make the right decision. As long as there are businesses and companies, there will be a need of these legal advisors.

If you are looking for such a legal advisor, then you need to take your time and find the one that has the most experience and the most success with legal issues that businesses are facing every day.

Benefits of using this legal advisor

There are many benefits that you will have, when you are using a corporate lawyer for your business or company.

The first thing is that you will not have to worry to search for someone with experience when someone sues your company. You will already have someone on stand-by. And, they will know exactly what is going on in the business, so you will save time to brief a new attorney.
The second benefit of having an attorney for your business, is that you will have someone that is going to read through every contract to make sure that everything is legit.

The one thing that people need to know about, is what a corporate lawyer specialist really is. And, why it is important for a business to have this type of legal advisor ready at hand. If you are considering becoming this type of attorney, then you will know that you will always have work to do. This type of advisors are always in demand. Every business, big or small, should have a corporate attorney behind them and the business.

Wednesday 19 April 2017

HSBC Sued by NY A.G. Over Foreclosure Abuse

Today, the New York State Attorney General’s Office (AGO) announced that it has filed suit against HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) in NY State Supreme Court in Erie County. See THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NY vs. HSBC BANK USA. The lawsuit states that HSBC is failing to follow state law related to foreclosure actions, thereby putting homeowners at greater risk of losing their homes.

Background

In New York, loans for real property are secured through mortgages rather than through deeds of trust. New York, unlike trust states, is a judicial foreclosure state. In states like New York, mortgage foreclosure actions must proceed through the judiciary system.

Clearly, there are laws that govern the judicial foreclosure process and lenders are no exception to the requirement that these laws be followed. The New York State Unified Court System (UCS) issued a rule in October 2010 requiring that all foreclosure law firms attest to the accuracy of the legal papers they filed in court, in response to the widely reported robo-signing scandal in the mortgage industry. Since the implementation of the rule, after a foreclosure action is filed, the foreclosure firm must file an affirmation (the “Due Diligence Affirmation”) simultaneously with its filing of a Request for Judicial Intervention (RJI). The process mandates that the lender then attend a settlement conference within 60 days. Surprisingly, many foreclosure law firms almost immediately stopped filing RJIs after issuance of the court rule. Foreclosure law firms who refuse to file the RJIs not only run afoul of state law, but also significantly injure homeowners who want to save their homes.

A RJI is a very important instrument in the litigation process that transforms an indexed case wherein documents are filed to a case that now has a justice assigned to the matter. Without an RJI, New York courts do not schedule court-supervised foreclosure settlement conferences. Cases, in which complaints are filed but no RJI is filed—which would otherwise move the case forward by assigning a justice to the matter—often linger indefinitely on the “shadow docket”. The shadow docket in New York consists of thousands of foreclosure cases that linger for several months, and sometimes years, causing distressed homeowners and the overtaxed judicial system to suffer. A recent report indicates that a “re-review of the November 2010 and March 2011 residential foreclosure filings in Brooklyn and Queens reveals that 43% of cases remain in the shadow docket.”

While cases are on the shadow docket, delinquent interest, inspection fees, attorney’s fees, and other costs in addition to the mortgage, continue to accrue. In general, the larger a loan balance, the more difficult it is to attain an appropriate and affordable modification.

Discussion

An investigation conducted by Attorney General Schneiderman showed that lenders HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) repeatedly failed to timely file the RJI in hundreds of foreclosure cases against New York homeowners, increasing the risk that those homeowners would lose their homes. A sampling of HSBC foreclosure filings from four counties — Erie, Monroe, Suffolk and Bronx — identified close to 300 instances where HSBC failed to file the RJI with the proof of service. In some of those cases, homeowners waited for over two years for HSBC to file the RJI.

“Companies like HSBC are brazenly ignoring state law, leaving homeowners across New York stuck in a legal limbo where they can’t even get the legally required settlement conference that could help them keep their homes,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “For homeowners facing foreclosure, time is their greatest enemy. Every day spent waiting for a settlement conference is a day that the lender piles on additional interest, fees and penalties and the homeowner falls further behind. I am committed to doing everything I can to stand up for New Yorkers who are trapped in the ‘shadow docket’ and denied their right to fight for their homes.”

As a result of these findings, Attorney General Schneiderman filed suit seeking to compel HSBC to file the RJI immediately in all cases in which it has filed a proof of service, and to file an RJI simultaneously with proof of service in all future cases. In cases where HSBC has already failed to file the RJI with proof of service on the homeowner, the suit also seeks to compel HSBC to take the following steps to protect New York homeowners:
  • Prepare an accounting of interest charges, penalties and fees (e.g. late fees, inspection fees, attorney’s fees, broker reports) that accrued beginning 60 days after the filing of proof of service on the homeowner;

  • Toll and waive all accrued interest charges, fees and penalties that accrued, or will accrue, beginning 60 days after the filing of proof of service on the homeowner;

  • Grant restitution for interest charges, fees and penalties paid by the homeowner that accrued beginning 60 days after the filing of proof of service on the homeowner; and

  • Grant damages to homeowners injured by HSBC’s illegal practices.
Case Details

The presiding justice is Justice John L. Michalski. The index number for the instant action is 001660/2013. The attorney representing the AGO is James Morrissey. The RJI was filed on May 31, 2013. The AGO’s motion seeking the aforementioned relief was filed on June 3, 2013 and has a motion hearing date of July 24, 2013.

Conclusion

New York is undoubtedly well-represented. Attorney General Schneiderman is committed to prosecuting HSBC and any other lenders that deny New York homeowners their legal rights to negotiate alternatives to foreclosure. Schneiderman asserts that he will not hesitate to bring similar actions against other mortgage lenders who hold borrowers in the shadow docket in defiance of state law.

Resource By : https://sewellnylaw.com/hsbc-sued-by-ny-a-g-over-foreclosure-abuse

Monday 17 April 2017

Patent lawyers and patent law firms

Client protection is ensured by monitoring the licensing requirement and compliance with the licensing conditions as well as by cooperating with the competent authorities such as the Office of the Public Prosecutor and the professional association. The FMA may also file disciplinary charges with the Court of Appeal. The legal foundations are the Financial Market Authority Act (FMA Act) and the Patent Lawyers Act (PLA).

Monitoring of licensing requirement / Use of professional and business terms


Anyone intending to offer services under the Patent Lawyers Act in the Principality of Liechtenstein requires an FMA licence as a patent lawyer or patent law firm. The FMA monitors compliance with this licensing requirement and authorized use of the term “patent lawyer” or equivalent professional or business term. It follows up on all indications of non-licensed patent lawyer activities or the use of protected terms by non-licensed persons.

If there is a justified suspicion that a person is engaged in commercial patent lawyer activities without authorization or is unlawfully using the term “patent lawyer” or an equivalent professional or business term, the FMA initiates supervisory proceedings to determine the state of affairs. It may demand information and documents from the persons concerned as if they were supervised persons. If the suspicion is substantiated in the course of the preliminary clarifications, the FMA files criminal charges with the Liechtenstein Office of the Public Prosecut.

Monitoring of compliance with licensing conditions

After granting the licence, the FMA monitors permanent compliance with the licensing conditions. If there are grounds for suspicion that the licensing conditions are no longer met, the FMA initiates supervisory proceedings and seizes the necessary measures. If, for instance, it comes to the attention of the FMA that a patent lawyer or patent law firm no longer maintains the legally required liability insurance, then it demands that the licensed person provide evidence of such insurance. If the person fails to comply, the FMA suspends the person’s activities as a patent lawyer until the evidence is provided.

Disciplinary offenses

If the FMA believes that a patent lawyer is breaching the obligations of his profession or that his professional or private conduct is interfering with the honour, reputation and credibility of the profession, then it files disciplinary charges with the Court of Appeal.

Cooperation with competent authorities

To combat abuse, the FMA works closely together with the competent bodies (Office of the Public Prosecutor, courts, authorities and professional association). With the exception of national and international obligations to cooperate, the FMA in principle does not provide information about ongoing proceedings.

Institutions for the protection of clients

FMA: The FMA’s competence covers the points referred to above. In particular, it is not responsible for civil disputes between professional trustees and their clients.

Penal authorities: Charges filed with the Court of Appeal as the disciplinary court for criminal proceedings initiated against professional trustees in cases of crimes or misdemeanors (article 21(2) PLA)

Resource By : https://www.fma-li.li/en/client-protection/safeguarding-client-protection-in-different-sectors/patent-lawyers-and-patent-law-firms.html

Thursday 13 April 2017

A Day in the Life of a Corporate Lawyer

Corporate lawyers ensure the legality of commercial transactions. They must have a knowledge of statutory law and regulations passed by government agencies to help their clients achieve their goals within the bounds of the law. To structure a business transaction legally, a corporate lawyer may need to research aspects of contract law, tax law, accounting, securities law, bankruptcy, intellectual property rights, licensing, zoning laws, and other regulations relating to a specific area of business. The lawyer must ensure that a transaction does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws. In contrast to the adversarial nature of trial law, corporate law is team-oriented. The corporate counsel for both sides of a transaction are not strict competitors; together they seek a common ground for their clients. They are, in the words of one lawyer, “the handmaidens of the deal.” Facilitating the business process requires insight into the clients needs, selective expertise, flexibility and most of all, a service mentality. Corporate law requires an incisive mind and excellent communication skills, both written and oral. Through the negotiation process, lawyers constantly write and revise the legal documents which will bind the parties to certain terms for the transaction. This process is lengthy and typically corporate lawyers work extremely long hours. As a deal moves towards its closing, it becomes an exercise in stamina as much as skillful negotiation. As one person observed, “The most important trait a lawyer can have is a leather-ass. You’ve got to be able to put your butt in a chair and do the work.” The upside to this profession is the compensation is good and you usually work with smart people. One corporate lawyer remarked that she liked this side of the law precisely because the transactions take place among peers: There is no wronged party, no underdog, and usually no inequity in the financial means of the participants.

Paying Your Dues

In law, the pressure starts early. Law school admission is extremely competitive-the top twenty-five schools have an admission rate of about 10%. You can get tracked early: The kind of school you attend affects what kind of summer job opportunities you may have, which in turn affects the kind of permanent job you secure. The starting salary and kind of experience you have as a corporate lawyer can vary greatly depending on the size of the firm and geographic location. In a smaller firm, you will have more responsibility and more client contact early on, but the salaries can be tens of thousands of dollars lower than in a large firm. The content of your practice will be different too: A small town lawyer may take care of a house closing, drafting a will and a divorce settlement in a day; big city lawyers can spend months negotiating one commercial transaction.

Present and Future

Thomas Jefferson introduced the first academic law program to the United States when he created a professorship in law at William and Mary in 1779. George Wyeth, a Virginia judge at the time and, later, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, was the first to fill the post. Harvard was not far behind, and was already producing lawyers of repute in the mid-1700s. The number of corporate lawyers grew exponentially in the 1980s when commercial activity was at its peak. When the economy slowed down, so did the need for attorneys. The practice of corporate law is less cushy now; the days of the endless expense account are gone. The state of the economy always shapes the nature of corporate law; changes in the interest rates, the tax code, and other regulations affect the kind of transactions being done and how they are structured.

Resource By : https://www.princetonreview.com/careers/168/corporate-lawyer

Patent Law Firm In Brooklyn

Patent Law Firm In Brooklyn – All of the attorneys at this firm, in addition to receiving their law licenses, have outstanding technical and scientific expertise from leading academic and scientific institutions. Moreover, each attorney has successfully passed the arduous United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Bar examination and is a registered patent attorney.

This is no small accomplishment. A small percentage of attorneys possess these remarkable qualifications, let alone are able to even qualify to sit for the Patent Bar. More laudatory, is the fact that the majority of the firm’s attorneys possess Big Firm experience and advanced degrees in addition to their Juris Doctor degrees. In addition to publishing and presenting on scientific and intellectual property topics, our attorneys have professional experience in the science and medical community. The exquisite combination of law and science, at a high level, requires a talented mind and a dedicated individual. The firm is proud of its members’ accomplishments and more pleased to offer these outstanding attorneys to its clients.

The firm provides full-service patent prosecution and litigation services to its clients. We invite you to enjoy patent practice at its best.
Mr. Sewell continuously distinguishes himself as a top intellectual property attorney. He is recognized as “Superb” and a “Top Intellectual Property Attorney” by the lawyer-rating service Avvo. Furthermore, Attorney Sewell is Chair of the Brooklyn Bar Association Intellectual Property Committee.

LAW FIRM OF DAYREL SEWELL, PLLC 

Web Site Here : https://sewellnylaw.com

Address : 599 E. 2nd St. Brooklyn, NY 11218

Email ID : info@sewellnylaw.com

Phone No : 347-787-6824

Tuesday 11 April 2017

Bar Association Chair and Vice-Chair

The LAW FIRM OF DAYREL SEWELL, PLLC is pleased to announce that Mr. Sewell is now appointed as Chair of the Brooklyn Bar Association Intellectual Property Committee and Vice-Chair of the Brooklyn Bar Association Real Property Committee.

Bar members are encouraged to join the Intellectual Property and/or Real Property sections. Several benefits of membership include Continuing Legal Education (CLE) classes, other professional development (i.e., networking), and social events.

LAW FIRM OF DAYREL SEWELL, PLLC 

Resource By
: https://sewellnylaw.com/bar-association-chair-and-vice-chair

Address : 599 E. 2nd St. Brooklyn, NY 11218 

Email ID
: info@sewellnylaw.com 

Phone No
: 347-787-6824

Monday 10 April 2017

Chairman Bar Association Highlight

The LAW FIRM OF DAYREL SEWELL, PLLC is pleased to announce that Mr. Sewell’s recent, featured publication, The Ignominious Patent Troll, also prominently appears in the year-end publication of the Brooklyn Barrister.

The Brooklyn Barrister is the official publication of the Brooklyn Bar Association. Dayrel looks forward to continuing his leadership roles as Chair of the Brooklyn Bar Association Intellectual Property law Committee and Vice-Chair of the Brooklyn Bar Association Real Property Committee.




Chairman Bar Association Highlight

Resource By : https://sewellnylaw.com/chairman-bar-association-highlight

Monday 3 April 2017

Law Journal Publication: Landlords and Loft space

The LAW FIRM of DAYREL SEWELL, PLLC is pleased to announce that Mr. Dayrel S. Sewell, Esq. and Mr. Lance Willoughby penned an article entitled, “Landlords and Loft space” that is now published in the Richmond County Bar Association’s Spring 2017 Journal.


The Richmond County Bar Association
(“RCBA”) was founded in 1909 to provide access to legal services for the Richmond County community. RCBA is dedicated to advancing members’ professional development and promoting the highest standards of excellence in the practice of law. RCBA journal first published in the spring of 1984.  The journal is published quarterly featuring legal articles, book reviews, product reviews or other items of interest to RCBA.

Landlords and Loft Space
” discusses the complexities of the “NYC Loft Law.” The article provides the legislative history and intent for the creation of NYC Loft Law. Also, the article discusses the negatives and positives for landlords and tenants under the NYC Loft Law. The NYC Loft Law is unique and ought to be understood by those who possess and/or plan to possess loft interest.

This publication represents the continuation of our firm’s commitment to providing value to the greater NYC community and service excellence to our clients.

Resource By : https://sewellnylaw.com/law-journal-publication-landlords-loft-space

Saturday 1 April 2017

Winner — Litigation Lawyer of the Year

The LAW FIRM of DAYREL SEWELL, PLLC is pleased to announce that Dayrel S. Sewell, Esq. has been selected as the outright winner and recipient in the category of — Litigation — Lawyer of the Year — USA by Finance Monthly. Finance Monthly selection criteria is dynamic, relying on matters such as legal expertise and innovation; peer recognition and personal achievement; and involvement in significant legal cases and legal activity.

The Finance Monthly Law Awards 2017 recognizes the achievements of law firms, lawyers, barristers and those connected to the legal world who have a proven track record in delivering results for their clients over the past twelve months. The awards are divided into individual and form categories. Each category has been selected to represent the diversity of skills and knowledge that the profession has to offer clients across the globe.

The voting and nomination is inclusive consisting of a three-month process. Voting procedures are sent to Finance Monthly’s readership database — over 195,880 contacts. All readers evaluate the nominees based on all the Law Awards criteria. This accomplishment for Dayrel S. Sewell, Esq., by Finance Monthly — Law Awards, exemplifies innovation in client care; strategic thinking and planning; and superior qualifications.

The Finance Monthly is a trusted source for business and corporate professionals, specifically legal practitioners, either in-house counsel or private practice.