Monday 20 March 2017

The most common instances when you may need a real estate attorney

Real estate is one area that you will have to look into at some point in your life. You may be interested in buying property at a particular location, and there are a lot of legal details that need to verification before you make the final payment. That is just one area that you may require an attorney to represent you. The Law Firm of Dayrel Sewell is one of the best in real estate cases and deals hence you would be wise to consult them on any related issues. However, the real estate field is quite extensive and covers a lot of different areas. Explained are some of the cases when you would need an attorneys counsel in a given case.
  1. When purchasing or selling a home
A real estate attorney is useful when you need to sell or buy a home for many reasons. For the seller, they will provide you with directions on how to value your property and how to handle the legal details of the purchase depending on the state of your home. Intellectual property litigation Brooklyn is also useful if you are selling to someone who isn’t a local by ensuring that the process runs smoothly. As a buyer, the attorney will help you check whether all the legal ownership documents are in place. The lawyers also advise if you are buying a home with structural concerns which may pose a problem later on. All these are important areas to look at, and an attorney will help smoothen out any rough edges and concerns.

2. If you don’t want to deal with an agent

Real estate agents earn a very high commission for the homes that they sell. The amount of the fee may be passed indirectly to you, which may make any property that you are buying very expensive. However, with a real estate attorney, this is made easier as they can get the contacts of the seller and help you get a good deal. Intellectual property law attorney is also a good option if you don’t want to get your agent to assist you in buying a house as they may be expensive and unreliable.

3. If you want control over the whole process

Dealing with agents may sideline you from the entire buying or selling process which is where a real estate attorney becomes useful. You will have direct connection and communication to your intellectual property litigation Brooklyn lawyer about what you want hence giving you more power over the whole process. In the end, you will make a more informed decision with advice from your attorney than if you had opted not to get one.

4. If you bought property with some legal issues

If you made the mistake of not using an intellectual property litigation Brooklyn lawyer during the actual purchase of a house then you later found out that it has some legal issues, you should seek advice from an attorney. He or she will advise you on the steps that you can take to protect yourself and get what you deserve. Ensure that you choose seasoned lawyers such as those from The Law Firm of Dayrel Sewell since this is the only way you can be sure of winning the case and getting what is rightfully yours.

5. Making sense of loan documents

Once you have identified a house or property that you want to purchase, but you need a loan to do so, an attorney will be an asset for you. The intellectual property law Brooklyn attorney will assist you to understand where you stand on the credit list and how to ensure that you get the amount you want or as close as possible to that.

6. Drafting the contracts and signing

Before you sign anything presented to you by the seller, pass it through your intellectual property litigation Brooklyn attorney who will check if everything is in order. They are in a position to identify any loopholes in the contract that may cause a problem in future so ensure that you only sign after getting the go-ahead from your attorney. This will protect you from losing your property later on or even being sued if there were any legal issues with it.

The Law Firm of Dayrel Sewell is the best place to get seasoned intellectual property litigation Brooklyn attorneys that will assist in ensuring that you invest wisely. Do not risk your money by choosing to get into an agreement alone, contact the firm for advice from the best in the industry.

Resource By : https://www.prlog.org/12627158-the-most-common-instances-when-you-may-need-real-estate-attorney.html

Thursday 16 March 2017

What to look for in an excellent law firm

There are a lot of challenges mars the day-to-day life of a human being. Some of these are unintentional, but the consequences are often similar and just as harsh. One common way that causes people to conflict is on legal issues that involve their personal lives, businesses, and ownership of property. If this happens, you may find yourself in a court of law to defend yourself, and that is why you need a good attorney that will work towards clearing your name. There are many law firms in the country that all have good reputations but, here are reasons why you should choose the Law Firm of Dayrel Sewell among all the options that you have.

1. Excellent qualifications

It goes without saying that the litigation attorney that you choose should be qualified enough to handle the cases brought to him or her. Mr. Sewell is qualified with a Degree from John Hopkins University, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law and M.P.H from Columbia University. He has received numerous awards that recognize his work in the legal field which sets him at the top of the chain. All the attorneys under him are qualified, so you are assured that you will be working with the best team you can get.

2. Adequate Experience

Practice makes perfect, it is said, and this is more so true in the legal field. A good litigation attorney should have an excellent understanding of the law and have practiced it for a good number of years which allows them to handle different kinds of tasks. It is most likely that such a lawyer may have handled a similar case in the past which will make it easy for them to win. Mr. Sewell and the attorneys under him all have these qualifications which guarantee any client that no case will be too difficult to control.

3. Hands on experience

A lot of patent lawyers do not have direct contact with their customers who make it difficult to handle the case at hand efficiently. The situation is different when you are dealing with the Law Firm of Dayrel Sewell since all the attorneys will always establish a relationship with their clients so as to approach the case better. What this does is allow you, the client, to be honest with your attorney and allow him to formulate an excellent way to argue in court and guarantee you victory.

4. Track record

An attorney that has had a lot of successes in the cases that they have handled is one that is most likely to enable you to win your case. It is for this reason that for any patent, business or real estate cases, the firm under Mr. Sewell will be best for you. You can check their good track record for the very complex cases that the patent lawyers handled hence you can be certain that they have the expertise to take whatever you have for them.

5. Excellent court technique

It is not difficult to find a patent attorney who has excellent advice and ideas on how to handle the case but is indigent at arguing in court. A good plan is essential, but you should have an attorney that can execute it flawlessly. A patent case requires that the attorney presents their facts clearly and accurately if they are to have any hope of a victory. If you have a lawyer that cannot argue his case in court, you may lose a lot more than what you are paying them especially if the case involves a lot of money.

6. Moderately priced

It is no secret that litigation attorney fees are usually quite high, especially if you are looking to hire the best. However, this doesn’t have to be so as some law firms can give you great deals without sacrificing the quality of service that you get. Mr. Sewell’s law firm allows you to get quality attorney services without having to force you into bankruptcy compared to other law firms of the same level.

There is a reason why you should halt your search for a good litigation lawyer when you see the name of Law Firm of Dayrel Sewell. You are assured first class experience and services with top of the range lawyers that are ready to assist you clear your name from any legal case.

Wednesday 1 March 2017

Demonstrative evidence: friend or foe?

A jury’s job throughout a trial is to comprehend, understand and process all of the information conveyed by both the attorneys and witnesses.  Plainly hearing this information without any form of aids (e.g., picture, graphs, physical objects, etc.) can lead to forgetfulness when it comes time for deliberations.  That is why it has been common practice in the trial world to use evidence to help these juries pair aids with facts throughout a trial.  Lawyers are afforded the ability to use demonstrative and substantive evidence throughout the presentation of their case: both to simplify information and make it more memorable.  Demonstrative evidence is used to give the jury a chance to experience the issues and facts of a case in the eyes of the presenting party.  The main purpose of demonstrative evidence is to make the jury believe that your theory of the case is the one that should prevail.



What is Demonstrative Evidence?

There are three general categories of evidence recognized in trial practice: real, testimonial and demonstrative.  For the purposes of this article, demonstrative and real evidence are the focus.  Real evidence is considered evidence that was actually involved in the case at trial.  For example, the gun that was used to commit an alleged murder, or the defective part of a product being questioned in a liability case would be considered substantive evidence.  Demonstrative evidence on the other hand, is used purely to enhance oral testimony.  Unlike real evidence, this type of evidence has no independent probative value because it had no part in the actual events of the case.  Demonstrative evidence is solely used to help the jury understand one’s theory of the case at hand.  Distinctive from substantive evidence, this type of evidence can be anything you can touch, see or hear as long as it was created for the purposes of litigation.  For example, the gun that was used to commit an alleged murder, mentioned above is substantive evidence, but a computer generated image of that gun or an exact replica of that gun, used for the purpose of making the jury better understand is demonstrative.  The most important distinction between real and demonstrative evidence is that real evidence can be taken into the jury room during their deliberations, while demonstrative evidence most certainly cannot.  The only relevance demonstrative evidence has to a case is to help explain the facts, and to help give a witness’s testimony greater probative value.  This kind of evidence does not have any independent relevance outside of that.

Resource By : https://sewellnylaw.com/demonstrative-evidence-friend-foe